[Asterisk-Dev] MeetMe Improvement

[Brian K. West]

ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww

bkw
----- Original Message ----- 
From: <dking at pimpsoft.com>
To: <asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 11:14 PM
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Dev] MeetMe Improvement


> For ease of use and varible formating, wouldn't XML be a valid
> option? We are talking about inheritable context correct? Seems to me
> xml would work great if I'm understanding you.
>
>  - D
>
> On 10 Jul 2004 at 13:47, James Golovich wrote:
>
> > I thought it was clear what I proposed, but I'll go over it.  Something
> > more like the iax.conf, sip.conf, etc. that has independant config
> > contexts for each entity.
> >
> > We have 3 different types of config files now.  Heres my rundown on
them:
> >
> > - One Context inherited top down
> > The one used by zapata.conf, one context topdown where everything
> > inherits the config above unless overridden
> >
> > - One entity per line
> > Then we have the one context with single lines representing entities,
> > these are not very scalable because you can only put so much information
> > on one line without making it confusing.  (voicemail.conf, agents.conf,
> > meetme.conf)
> >
> > - One Context per entity
> > Then there is the one context per entity method that I alluded to in my
> > previous email.  Of course there are downsides to everything, if
> > everything varies from the default the config file will be much larger,
> > but you can reorder the contexts and add/remove them without worrying
what
> > will happen to the rest of the config
> >
> > James
> >
> > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Marc Olivier Chouinard wrote:
> >
> > > What do you propose then ?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: asterisk-dev-admin at lists.digium.com
> > > [mailto:asterisk-dev-admin at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of James
Golovich
> > > Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 12:12 PM
> > > To: asterisk-dev at lists.digium.com
> > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Dev] MeetMe Improvement
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sat, 10 Jul 2004, Marc Olivier Chouinard wrote:
> > >
> > > > Here is a sample of a future Conference app could look like. It
> > > > support multiple user with different limit/pin for each users.  I
> > > > based it on the zapata.conf with the channel setup, userid => create
> > > > the user base on the lastest info he got from the previous entry.
> > > >
> > > > I'll like your comment on it, should we look at another direction or
???
> > >
> > > I don't think inheriting the above config entries is that great of an
idea.
> > > I'd much rather see independant config contexts for each conference.
> > >
> > > It's slightly easier to build config parser/generators that don't
depend on
> > > specific order of entries, also for the newer users that type of
config file
> > > can be difficult to wrap their brains around.
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> > Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-Dev mailing list
> Asterisk-Dev at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>    http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-dev
>