[Asterisk-Dev] Current database abstraction effort ?
Chris Albertson
chrisalbertson90278 at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 5 11:18:25 MST 2004
> >
> > However, I'm wondering whether adding unixodbc requirement to do
> > database handling may :
> > - make building asterisk harder (more packages to get)
Anything you add makes it harder to build. But you can do things
like keep a "good" version of ODBC at the asterisk.org site so
users don't have to go hunting..
Using ODBC can actually make Asterisk __easyer__ to configure as
__all__ CDR logging could go through it. Weather you are logging
to a text file, MySQL, or Oracle the same library and config file
is used. Less to maintain and test.
> > - make it more prone to various lib incompatibilites (is unixodbc
> > compatible between versions ?)
> > - add some unnecessary complexity, and/or have significant a
> > performance cost.
The performance cost is low. Even on a larg PBX how many CDR
records per second are written? My guess is that 100 per second
would be a LOT. But 100/sec would not tax a reasonable PC running
ODBC
> > - not provide that much of an help : how well is unixodbc (and its
> > database drivers) packaged in the most widespread distros
> > (Debian, RH/Fedora, Suse, MDK...) ?
> >
> > Could the people familiar with unixODBC share their views on these
> > topics ?
> >
=====
Chris Albertson
Home: 310-376-1029 chrisalbertson90278 at yahoo.com
Cell: 310-990-7550
Office: 310-336-5189 Christopher.J.Albertson at aero.org
KG6OMK
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list