[Asterisk-Dev] Non RFC-compliance
William Waites
asterisk at lists.styx.org
Mon Feb 23 09:21:23 MST 2004
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:10:35AM +0100, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
>
> Please explain more - which "other response classes"?
>
I quoted:
> A UAC MUST treat any final response it does not recognize as being
> equivalent to the x00 response code of that class, and MUST be able
> to process the x00 response code for all classes. For example, if a
> UAC receives an unrecognized response code of 431, it can safely
> assume that there was something wrong with its request and treat the
> response as if it had received a 400 (Bad Request) response code.
--
/~\ The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ / No HTML/RTF in email
X No Word docs in email
/ \ Respect for open standards
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list