[Asterisk-Dev] Non RFC-compliance

William Waites asterisk at lists.styx.org
Mon Feb 23 09:21:23 MST 2004

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 09:10:35AM +0100, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
> Please explain more - which "other response classes"?

I quoted:

>   A UAC MUST treat any final response it does not recognize as being
>   equivalent to the x00 response code of that class, and MUST be able
>   to process the x00 response code for all classes.  For example, if a
>   UAC receives an unrecognized response code of 431, it can safely
>   assume that there was something wrong with its request and treat the
>   response as if it had received a 400 (Bad Request) response code.

/~\  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
\ /    No HTML/RTF in email
 X     No Word docs in email
/ \  Respect for open standards

More information about the asterisk-dev mailing list