[Asterisk-Dev] End of public smear campaign by pimpsoft

[dking at pimpsoft.com]

The problem is I would love to go forward with everything, but I have a moral problem. The people that came forward to me with the information I have that proves I am right requested they not be involved and general stated they did not want it known they did indeed have the same fears as me. But to prove my points I would have to break that trust and go against there wishes.

Im currently exploring other options, but at this time I cant give up the identity of the people on the list who have contacted me about this and given me evidence I am correct so I am at a standstill due to my own ethical and moral obligations.

I hope you can understand my moral obligations at this point, the last thing I want to be is be a troll or some asshole who goes around making statements he cant prove and I although it may seem as if I am indeed this person, I tell you I am not and have the safety of the open source community in mind.

I’m currently waiting for a email that may give me the other option I need, but until I get it all I can do is wait. THAT is why I have been unresponsive lately, I’m waiting for the ok to continue.


On 1 Aug 2004 at 0:15, Justin wrote:

> On Sat, 31 Jul 2004 15:50:14 -0700, dking at pimpsoft.com
> <dking at pimpsoft.com> wrote:
> > NO they are not following the development model that the fsf
> > recommends. I have proof of this but as everyone has so aptly pointed
> > out I have no credibility to use to help fix the problem so pointing
> > out the flaws would only make this flame war you all insist on
> > keeping alive despite my best efforts to keep it civil keep going on.
> > 
> > Everyone here seems mixed up on the point I was trying to make.
> 
> flaming you or not, we've actually produced examples and evidence
> which runs counter to your claims. you have not produced a single
> example or bit of evidence to support your claim. if someone started
> waving his arms and telling *you* that you were breaking the law, then
> ran away, then came back and did it again, etc... would you appreciate
> it?
> 
> and why is it you insist on keeping this 'proof' a secret?
> 
> -justin
>