[Asterisk-Dev] switch => Parking/companya
Chris Parker
cparker at segv.org
Wed Apr 28 15:16:09 MST 2004
At 07:19 PM 4/27/2004, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
> > http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0001494
> > MERRY NEW YEAR... and happy parking!!!!
>
>So I read the bug and (briefly) perused the patch... And I don't think I
>fully understand the extent or gain over regular parking. Can you provide a
>better example?
[ resend, as I sent from a non-subscribed address before ]
Biggest benefit, is that it actually parks in the sense that a traditional
PBX does.
Traditional PBX doesn't 'accidently' bridge two calls. Asterisk in current
'parking' does.
That is a major failure on the part of Asterisk IMHO.
If the change can be made in such a way that it can still allow the
current ( and IMHO incorrect ) behaviour, then I solidly vote for this
to be included. People who want to keep the current behaviour, can.
People who can't deploy this as-is without the ability to not allow
an end-user to park/bridge two calls together by accident, can get what
they need.
Everybody wins, everybody gets the behaviour they want.
Anyone disagree?
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ Chris Parker - Segmentation Fault ( core dumped )
\ ~ ~ / \
| @ @
| \ http://www.segv.org | cparker at segv.org
oOo (_) oOo \
------------------------------------------------------------------------
# OS's are nothing more than device drivers! #
More information about the asterisk-dev
mailing list