[asterisk-commits] murf: branch 1.4 r119929 - /branches/1.4/pbx/pbx_ael.c

[SVN commits to the Asterisk project]

Author: murf
Date: Tue Jun  3 09:49:46 2008
New Revision: 119929

URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&rev=119929
Log:
as per http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2008-June/212934.html,
which is a message from Philipp Kempgen, requesting that the WARNING
that an extension is empty be reduced to a NOTICE or less, as empty
extensions are syntactically possible, and no big deal.

With which I agree, and have removed that WARNING message entirely.
I think it is not necessary to see this message. It didn't 
state that a NoOp() was inserted automatically on your behalf,
and really, as users, who cares? Why freak out dialplan writers
with unnecessary warnings? The details of the machinations a compiler goes
thru to produce working assembly code is of little interest
to most programmers-- we will follow the unix principal of
doing our work silently.



Modified:
    branches/1.4/pbx/pbx_ael.c

Modified: branches/1.4/pbx/pbx_ael.c
URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk/branches/1.4/pbx/pbx_ael.c?view=diff&rev=119929&r1=119928&r2=119929
==============================================================================
--- branches/1.4/pbx/pbx_ael.c (original)
+++ branches/1.4/pbx/pbx_ael.c Tue Jun  3 09:49:46 2008
@@ -4035,12 +4035,6 @@
 						exten-> return_target = np2;
 					}
 					/* is the last priority in the extension a label? Then add a trailing no-op */
-					if( !exten->plist_last )
-					{
-						ast_log(LOG_WARNING, "Warning: file %s, line %d-%d: Empty Extension!\n",
-								p2->filename, p2->startline, p2->endline);
-					}
-					
 					if ( exten->plist_last && exten->plist_last->type == AEL_LABEL ) {
 						struct ael_priority *np2 = new_prio();
 						np2->type = AEL_APPCALL;