[Asterisk-code-review] func_channel: Added new OTHER_CHANNEL function (asterisk[master])

[Joshua Colp]

Attention is currently required from: N A, Mark Murawski.
Joshua Colp has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/15893 )

Change subject: func_channel: Added new OTHER_CHANNEL function
......................................................................


Patch Set 7:

(1 comment)

Patchset:

PS7: 
> This function has been needed for a very long time. […]
The difference between the two is where the code is executed. In AMI its executed within a manager thread which is perfectly fine. For here it's executed within a channel thread. The concern was the possibility of a deadlock due to that locking scenario. Is it possible two channels could execute this on the respective other channel at the same time, with the channel locks held? (This could cause a deadlock) Is that possible based on where this could be used?



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/15893
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I7492645ae4307553d0f586d78e13a4f586231fdf
Gerrit-Change-Number: 15893
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: N A <mail at interlinked.x10host.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-Reviewer: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Mark Murawski <markm at intellasoft.net>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
Gerrit-CC: Joshua Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com>
Gerrit-Attention: N A <mail at interlinked.x10host.com>
Gerrit-Attention: Mark Murawski <markm at intellasoft.net>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:45:15 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: Mark Murawski <markm at intellasoft.net>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20220210/fc67b132/attachment.html>