[Asterisk-code-review] force inline: remove all force inline from asterisk. (asterisk[master])

[Kevin Harwell]

Kevin Harwell has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/10936 )

Change subject: force_inline: remove all force_inline from asterisk.
......................................................................


Patch Set 4:

Would it make sense then to leave the function definitions alone, but move the code into another function, which is then called by the current one? Thus, not modifying the definition, but making them all one-line calls to another function that resides in a *.c file.

The original function would continue to be inlined, but then the compiler could decide on the subfunction?

Would that work to not break abi and still fix the problem while working around the compiler issue?


-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/10936
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
Gerrit-Change-Id: I2a90249763a7139fd12c54ad4e0e8d5cbbed14f9
Gerrit-Change-Number: 10936
Gerrit-PatchSet: 4
Gerrit-Owner: Chris Savinovich <csavinovich at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Chris Savinovich <csavinovich at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Corey Farrell <git at cfware.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation (1000185)
Gerrit-Reviewer: George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Kevin Harwell <kharwell at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Matthew Fredrickson <creslin at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Richard Mudgett <rmudgett at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Walter Doekes <walter+asterisk at wjd.nu>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 19:41:48 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: No
Gerrit-HasLabels: No
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20190218/2e276e2f/attachment.html>