[Asterisk-code-review] main/pbx.c: Fixed to call the ast_softhangup() (...asterisk[master])

Joshua Colp asteriskteam at digium.com
Tue Apr 2 18:14:24 CDT 2019


Joshua Colp has posted comments on this change. ( https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/11149 )

Change subject: main/pbx.c: Fixed to call the ast_softhangup()
......................................................................


Patch Set 7:

(1 comment)

https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/11149/6/res/ari/resource_channels.c 
File res/ari/resource_channels.c:

https://gerrit.asterisk.org/#/c/11149/6/res/ari/resource_channels.c@1000 
PS6, Line 1000: 			ret = pbx_exec(ast_dial_answered(dial), app, origination->appdata);
> Hm. I'm not sure what you asking about. […]
I meant why is this change necessary now? Is it because before the channel remained valid and so the destruction of dial resulted in its destruction - but now the channel ownership is transferred?



-- 
To view, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/c/asterisk/+/11149
To unsubscribe, or for help writing mail filters, visit https://gerrit.asterisk.org/settings

Gerrit-Project: asterisk
Gerrit-Branch: master
Gerrit-Change-Id: I6652359e42bb9fe3f2c44c03df4365c183baf73d
Gerrit-Change-Number: 11149
Gerrit-PatchSet: 7
Gerrit-Owner: sungtae kim <pchero21 at gmail.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: Friendly Automation
Gerrit-Reviewer: Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>
Gerrit-Reviewer: sungtae kim <pchero21 at gmail.com>
Gerrit-Comment-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 23:14:24 +0000
Gerrit-HasComments: Yes
Gerrit-Has-Labels: No
Comment-In-Reply-To: sungtae kim <pchero21 at gmail.com>
Comment-In-Reply-To: Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com>
Gerrit-MessageType: comment
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-code-review/attachments/20190402/20f423ca/attachment.html>


More information about the asterisk-code-review mailing list