[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0016685]: [patch] Configured CFLAGS/LDFLAGS are used by main, but not by modules built out of tree
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Sun Mar 7 13:46:57 CST 2010
The following issue has been UPDATED.
======================================================================
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16685
======================================================================
Reported By: pprindeville
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 16685
Category: Core/BuildSystem
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Target Version: 1.6.0.26
Asterisk Version: SVN
JIRA: SWP-789
Regression: No
Reviewboard Link:
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2010-01-24 22:09 CST
Last Modified: 2010-03-07 13:46 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Configured CFLAGS/LDFLAGS are used by main,
but not by modules built out of tree
Description:
The patch supplied by Kevin in:
http://svn.asterisk.org/svn-view/asterisk?view=rev&rev=214696
doesn't include Makefile.rules, so out-of-tree modules (which use
Makefile.moddir_rules which includes Makefile.rules) won't have properly
initialized values for _ASTCFLAGS and ASTLDFLAGS.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0119070) pprindeville (reporter) - 2010-03-07 13:46
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=16685#c119070
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"It is unlawful for somebody to prepare a package which is intended to be
linked to Asterisk but is not licensed under the GPL, except by special
arrangement with Digium."
That may be, but someone may still have a legitimate reason for building
such code if only to do a proof-of-concept *before* bothering to waste
Digium's time by negotiating a "special arrangement" for something that may
or may not turn out to be technically feasible.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-03-07 13:46 pprindeville Note Added: 0119070
2010-03-07 13:46 pprindeville Status closed => new
2010-03-07 13:46 pprindeville Resolution no change required =>
reopened
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list