[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0017384]: CPU usage very high when putting call on MOH

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17384 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                coolmig
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   17384
Category:                   Resources/res_musiconhold
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.6.2.8-rc1 
JIRA:                       SWP-1994 
Regression:                 No 
Reviewboard Link:            
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2010-05-24 11:26 CDT
Last Modified:              2010-08-16 15:52 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    CPU usage very high when putting call on MOH
Description: 
Test scenario is very simple, two asterisk servers talking to each other
SIP.

SIP phone dials a extension on the first server which makes a call to the
other server that queues the call (and plays MOH). CPU usage is very
little, as always.

As long as I enable MOH on the SIP client, the CPU usage skyrockets... as
soon as I stop MOH on the SIP phone, everything goes back to normal.

This limits normal asterisk use with many channels involved.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0126000) lmadsen (administrator) - 2010-08-16 15:52
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=17384#c126000 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Wait, you said all along that you were using res_timing_pthread, not
res_timing_dahdi -- then I asked if you got a better response if NOT using
res_timing_pthread -- so I have no idea what timing module you're actually
using here. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-08-16 15:52 lmadsen        Note Added: 0126000                          
======================================================================