No subject

can see that it attempts to insert '1292094492.137196' instead of '0'. More
strangely, the billsec number that it attempts to insert looks very similar
to the UNIQUEID
___________
2010-12-11 19:08:12 UTC ERROR:  numeric field overflow
2010-12-11 19:08:12 UTC DETAIL:  A field with precision 14, scale 6 must
round to an absolute value less than 10^8.
2010-12-11 19:08:12 UTC STATEMENT:  INSERT INTO cdr
("clidnum","clidname","dialednum","calldate","answer","callend","duration","billsec","disposition","uniqueid","sequence")
VALUES (,,,,'2010-12-11 20:08:12','2010-12-11 20:08:12','2010-12-11
20:08:12','0.029349','1292094492.137196','NO
ANSWER','arcas-1292094492.13',0)
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0129570) joscas (reporter) - 2010-12-13 06:02
 https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18460#c129570 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I've checked with non-hires CDRs and I've found that there is exactly the
same problem. It appears that the problem is not linked to high-res CDRs.

I've also checked that CDRs are written correctly for cdr_custom. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2010-12-13 06:02 joscas         Note Added: 0129570                          
======================================================================