No subject
Sun Jul 19 19:54:31 CDT 2009
can see that it attempts to insert '1292094492.137196' instead of '0'. More
strangely, the billsec number that it attempts to insert looks very similar
to the UNIQUEID
___________
2010-12-11 19:08:12 UTC ERROR: numeric field overflow
2010-12-11 19:08:12 UTC DETAIL: A field with precision 14, scale 6 must
round to an absolute value less than 10^8.
2010-12-11 19:08:12 UTC STATEMENT: INSERT INTO cdr
("clidnum","clidname","dialednum","calldate","answer","callend","duration","billsec","disposition","uniqueid","sequence")
VALUES (,,,,'2010-12-11 20:08:12','2010-12-11 20:08:12','2010-12-11
20:08:12','0.029349','1292094492.137196','NO
ANSWER','arcas-1292094492.13',0)
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0129569) snuffy (manager) - 2010-12-13 05:02
https://issues.asterisk.org/view.php?id=18460#c129569
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Is there such a problem for 'non-hires' cdr's?
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2010-12-13 05:02 snuffy Note Added: 0129569
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list