[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014501]: [patch] Addition of DAHDI application to call libpri functions for MWI via ISDN/CISC.

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14501 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                jeremy1
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14501
Category:                   Channels/chan_dahdi/NewFeature
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1-rc1 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!): 171966 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-02-18 16:18 CST
Last Modified:              2009-02-18 16:55 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Addition of DAHDI application to call libpri
functions for MWI via ISDN/CISC.
Description: 
Many will find useful an open application which invokes libpri's
pri_mwi_activate and pri_mwi_deactivate functions.

Patch attached.

I know next to nothing about C so here are some things that I hope others
will help cleanup:

1. Asterisk attempts to hang up channels which wouldn't happen since this
is a CISC. Example output:
[Feb 18 15:06:55] WARNING[12069]: chan_dahdi.c:11336 pri_dchannel: Hangup
requested on unconfigured channel 0/0 span 1
[Feb 18 15:06:56] WARNING[12069]: chan_dahdi.c:10285 pri_fixup_principle:
Call specified, but not found?
[Feb 18 15:06:56] WARNING[12069]: chan_dahdi.c:11463 pri_dchannel: Hangup
REQ on bad channel 0/3 on span 1

2. The activate and de-activate functions should be wrapped into one with
a passed variable making the case difference.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0100344) jeremy1 (reporter) - 2009-02-18 16:55
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14501#c100344 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Thank you. I will gladly sign the agreement when it's safe to do so. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-02-18 16:55 jeremy1        Note Added: 0100344                          
======================================================================