[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014501]: [patch] Addition of DAHDI application to call libpri functions for MWI via ISDN/CISC.

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14501 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                jeremy1
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14501
Category:                   Channels/chan_dahdi/NewFeature
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.1-rc1 
Regression:                 No 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!): 171966 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2009-02-18 16:18 CST
Last Modified:              2009-02-18 16:52 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Addition of DAHDI application to call libpri
functions for MWI via ISDN/CISC.
Description: 
Many will find useful an open application which invokes libpri's
pri_mwi_activate and pri_mwi_deactivate functions.

Patch attached.

I know next to nothing about C so here are some things that I hope others
will help cleanup:

1. Asterisk attempts to hang up channels which wouldn't happen since this
is a CISC. Example output:
[Feb 18 15:06:55] WARNING[12069]: chan_dahdi.c:11336 pri_dchannel: Hangup
requested on unconfigured channel 0/0 span 1
[Feb 18 15:06:56] WARNING[12069]: chan_dahdi.c:10285 pri_fixup_principle:
Call specified, but not found?
[Feb 18 15:06:56] WARNING[12069]: chan_dahdi.c:11463 pri_dchannel: Hangup
REQ on bad channel 0/3 on span 1

2. The activate and de-activate functions should be wrapped into one with
a passed variable making the case difference.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0100343) qwell (administrator) - 2009-02-18 16:52
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14501#c100343 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
You deleted your note, but your concern is very valid (about personal
information being sent in cleartext for the license agreement).  We're
looking into options.  Stay tuned. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2009-02-18 16:52 qwell          Note Added: 0100343                          
======================================================================