[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011282]: [patch] Execute AGI from the CLI and the manager interface
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Dec 11 11:49:47 CST 2007
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11282
======================================================================
Reported By: moy
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 11282
Category: Applications/NewFeature
Reproducibility: N/A
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: SVN
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): trunk
SVN Revision (number only!): 89394
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-17-2007 23:09 CST
Last Modified: 12-11-2007 11:49 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Execute AGI from the CLI and the manager
interface
Description:
This new application allow to take control of the applications executed
using the Asterisk console or via AMI.
[default]
exten => _X.,1,Answer()
exten => _X.,2,DynamicApp()
exten => _X.,3,Hangup()
Once the channel enter DynamicApp, it will wait there for applications to
execute. Applications may arrive either from the console or AMI, like
this:
*CLI> dynapp SIP/testing-09124338 Playback hello-world
That will execute Playback application with hello-world arguments.
The same using AMI:
Action: AddDynApp
Channel: SIP/testing-09124338
App: Playback
Data: hello-world
I need some help of you guys to check locking/unlocking of channels, I
think I am doing right, but I am still unsure about some cases. It seems to
work though.
Comments and corrections are always welcomed.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
moy - 12-11-07 11:49
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mnicholson: I have not tried Adhearsion, sounds like a pretty cool project.
Similar in goals to the closed source framework we developed in PHP at the
company I worked for 2 years ago. I would have to try it to be able to give
an educated opinion and point out the differences.
In the other hand, I do know using FastAGI is a feasible way of
approaching the same problem. But I don't need nor want a separate TCP
socket for each call.
And what about the CLI AGI feature! ain't that cool? :)
Seriously, discussion can continue in asterisk-dev, the "Unified Asterisk
Interface" topic is getting hot.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
12-11-07 11:49 moy Note Added: 0075220
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list