[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010289]: Old LAGRQ frames showing up in new IAX2 calls
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Wed Aug 1 14:38:48 CDT 2007
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10289
======================================================================
Reported By: mihai
Assigned To: russell
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 10289
Category: Channels/chan_iax2
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
Asterisk Version: 1.4.8
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 07-24-2007 10:52 CDT
Last Modified: 08-01-2007 14:38 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: Old LAGRQ frames showing up in new IAX2 calls
Description:
If there are two successive IAX2 calls having the same source and
destination call id, sometimes old LAGRQ frames belonging to the first call
are transmitted as part of a VNAK retransmission during the second call.
Since the old LAGRQ have wildly out of order sequence numbers, the other
endpoint will request retransmission, which can cause a VNAK storm.
I am able to reproduce this by stress testing chan_iax2 with an automated
script that generates about 3 calls per second, up to about 200
simultaneous calls. This will pretty much guarantee that source ids will
be recycled on the server side, which can trigger this issue.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
mihai - 08-01-07 14:38
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Uploaded two patches that attempt to solve the problem.
The first one is just a first attempt, and has some issues.
The second one is better and more elegant. Here's what it does:
- add a flag to iax_thread that signals if the thread is ready to accept
conditions
- after creating the thread, wait in a spinloop for the flag to pop up
- in iax2_process_thread, set the flag after we lock our mutex
This way we ensure that by the time schedule_action gets its thread, the
thread will be ready
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
08-01-07 14:38 mihai Note Added: 0068237
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list