[Asterisk-bsd] Asterisk 1.2.7.1 ports

[Cian Hughes]

I would agree that bristuff shouldn't be in the main port however the  
main port was sponsored by a company that wanted it. It doesn't work  
with many "active" ISDN cards. Infact the chan_capi bundled with  
BRIstuff breaks builds on some setups, (eg where the default capi20.h  
belongs to C4B).

Regards. Cian.

On 25 Apr 2006, at 19:53, Thomas Sandford wrote:

> "Vahan Yerkanian" <vahan at arminco.com> wrote:
>> Thomas Sandford wrote:
>>> If you are not fussed about the bristuff patches, you can use my  
>>> updated version of the port at
>>>
>>> http://www.paradisegreen.co.uk/asterisk/
>>>
>>> [actually IMHO the bristuff should _not_ be in the official port,  
>>> or at least should be a separate port,
>>> precisely because it doesn't seem to track the official releases,  
>>> and so holds FreeBSD back to an
>>> old version of Asterisk].
>>>
>>> [sobomax - feel free to lift all or any of this version to  
>>> include in the official port]
>>
>> I second this. Not everyone uses bristuff - it can be made an  
>> option like ODBC and H323 is now.
>
> Shortly after writing the original message above I filed a PR  
> formally proposing the change to separate ports for the bristuffed  
> asterisk/libpri (right about the time that Cian Hughes pointed out  
> to me that libpri now also needed bristuff removing to build 1.2.7.1).
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/96315
>
> -- 
> Thomas Sandford
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd