[Asterisk-bsd] FreeBPX

Jeff LaCoursiere jeff at jeff.net
Wed Apr 12 12:12:13 MST 2006


I agree with all of this.  I guess I get by because I know the underlying
asterisk config and can fix anything that isn't working one way or
another.  And I am not using queues or faxing or anything really fancy.
Just call switching and auto-attendant.

j

On Wed, 12 Apr 2006, Shawn O'Connor wrote:

> Hey Jeff,
>
> My problem with the @home product is that it seems like they don't QA
> their releases.  So, one release will be produced and queues won't be
> working, the next release the digital receptionist won't work but queues
> will be working.  Then, the next those two will be fixed but fax support
> will be broken.
>
> The other big problem that I have is that there's no clear migration
> path from semi-broken version to semi-broken version.  Everyone seems to
> say, take screen shots, blow it away, and reinstall.  Egads!  With a
> normal asterisk install, I can control the upgrade process quite nicely.
>
> I will agree that the linux zaptel modules are more stable than the
> freebsd.  I wonder if the sangoma hardware modules with FreeBSD asterisk
> are the way to go.  Anyone have good input on that?
>
>     -Shawn
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
>
> !DSPAM:443d405e178151677836674!
>
>


More information about the Asterisk-BSD mailing list