[Asterisk-bsd] 4.x vs 5x/6x support

[Vahan Yerkanian]

Guys, guys!

Isn't it easier to split into 2 different ports for 4.x and 5.x/6.x and 
stop this debate? F.e. mysql does this for their 4.0, 4.1 and 5.0 
branches for freebsd ports without much noise. With a separate volunteer 
4.x port maintainer it's the most painless path for all of us IMHO.

Just my 2 cents in,
Vahan

Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Richard Neese wrote:
> 
>> well I  nice to hear but what has kept you from moving to 5.x wich was a
>> stable branch and works fine. it should not be those of use who move 
>> ahead in
>> life have to pay because others choose to lag.
>>
>> its time to catchup ot branch off. and let the drivers move forward 
>> this stale
>> mate has to end.
>>
>> we need updated drivers and if 4.x vs 5.x 6.x is the main issue then 
>> sorry
>> support for 4.x has to go stale.
>>
>> this is time to move onword and upword.
> 
> 
> Got any more dusty sayings?   When you put a machine into production
> it's not the same as your hobby machine where you can dick around with
> the operating system and upgrade and downgrade anytime you want.
> 
> Not that it's any of your business, but I am running 5.x and 6-B5 on
> other machines.  There are reasons beyond production for the others
> to have to stay at 4.x - but with your current attitude about it I have
> no doubt that you'd fail to understand.
> 
> Vince.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: vahan.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 287 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-bsd/attachments/20051004/4adfbb23/vahan.vcf