[Asterisk-bsd] TDM400P FXS on FreeBSD 5.2.1-release - sanity check

[Chris Stenton]

Let us know how you get on.


Thanks

Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jeff Rizzo" <riz+asterisk at boogers.sf.ca.us>
To: "Asterisk on BSD discussion" <asterisk-bsd at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-bsd] TDM400P FXS on FreeBSD 5.2.1-release - sanity 
check


> It would seem that once I got more of the asterisk configuration 
> completed, I got my much sought-after dialtone, and  have been able to 
> terminate SIP calls onto an analog phone.
>
> So, looks like the TDM400P FXS support works!
> (At least with the limited testing I've done)
>
> Thanks and sorry for the noise,
> +j
>
> Jeff Rizzo wrote:
>
>> OK, now that I've got the power  connector  actually connected, and the 
>> zaptel driver recognizes my FXS port, I want to verify that the  board is 
>> supposed to be generating a dialtone, because I don't get  one.
>>
>> The driver shows the  following when I load it:
>>
>> Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196
>> FXS device: vendor=e159 device=1 subvendor=b100
>> wcfxs0: <Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 
>> 0xfebff000-0xfebfffff irq 27 at device 2.0 on pci1
>> FXS Attach for wcfxs0: deviceID : 0xe159
>> Freshmaker version: 71
>> Freshmaker passed register test
>> Module 0: Installed -- AUTO FXS
>> Module 1: Installed -- AUTO FXO
>> Module 2: Not installed
>> Module 3: Not installed
>> Found a Wildcard TDM: Wildcard TDM400P REV E/F (4 modules)
>> Registered tone zone 0 (United States / North America)
>>
>> I've added the following to /usr/local/etc/zaptel.conf:
>>
>> fxoks=1
>> fxsks=2
>> loadzone=us
>> defaultzone=us
>>
>> When I run ztcfg, it show this:
>> Keyword: [fxoks], Value: [1]
>> Keyword: [fxsks], Value: [2]
>> Keyword: [loadzone], Value: [us]
>> Keyword: [defaultzone], Value: [us]
>>
>> My assumption is that at this point, I should be able to plug an analog 
>> phone into channel 1 and hear a dialtone generated by the board... I 
>> don't.  Am I wrong, here?  Any suggestions what  to try next?  I'm going 
>> to forge ahead and do some configuration of asterisk to test out the FXO 
>> port anyway, but I was hoping to get some  confirmation that the FXS port 
>> might actually work...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> +j
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
>> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Asterisk-BSD mailing list
> Asterisk-BSD at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-bsd
>