[asterisk-biz] Nufone appears to be on the rebound

[Greg Boehnlein]

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Paul wrote:

> Bret,
> 
> I was strictly referring to protection of the numbers. I think the state
> and federal regulators need to require that portable numbers be offered
> in more cases(although reasonable fees may be charged). This requirement
> could be based on total subscribers, total DID count or some formula
> using such stats. My point is that I think it absolutely wrong right now
> that companies like vonage can port in a Maine number originally issued
> to me by Verizon but they won't assign me a new number that is equally
> portable. I think it would be fair if the regulators required you, me,
> vonage or nufone to do that once we grow to a certain size.

Question: Does Vonage billing have a Local Number Portability charge on 
their bill? Is Vonage an RBOC/I/CLEC? If so, they are legally required to 
provide number portability such that if you they assign you a number, you 
legally have the right to port it to whatever carrier you choose. However, 
if Vonage is claiming they are NOT a 'Telephone Company', then I think it 
is less clear as to what you may legally compell them to do.

IANAL, but it seems clear to me that VoIP companies are trying to say 
"We're NOT a telephone company", but customers are expecting to have all 
the same rights that they would under Telco Regulation.

> I don't think DID's should be used as hostages when there is a billing
> dispute. All providers, regardless of whether they are a "real phone
> company" or not have to make the right decisions about extending credit.
> I say make them release the numbers and later they can ask a court to
> add those costs to the damage award.

I agree with this, but at the same time, the regulation related to Number 
Portability defines specific maximum timeframes under which a carrier MUST 
respond to a number port. In my experiences with SBC/AT&T and other larger 
carriers, the RBOCS generally sit on stuff until the last possible moment, 
then kick it back if their is a single issue with it, rather than handling 
the ports in a timely, efficient manner. I.E. Number Ports are the lowest 
priority item on the totem pole.

-- 
    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
                             KP-216-121-ST