[asterisk-biz] A DID question

[Guillaume ARNAUD _ Allomundo.com]

Hi,

I am not sure you understood the purpose of this SuperDID.. it is only 
to use callback from countries where CallerID does not go through very well.

For exemple, my phone number in France is +3361650047 (it's fake, don't 
try).. then i would call some wiered phone number :
+9991110001113361650047 (see my phone number is included & yes, 999 is 
not a good country code).
This is to avoid having one DID per user of my service... now to avoid 
weired call back, I'll just have to check that user +3361650047 is 
registered with my services.

So anyone :) ?

G.


Matthew Rubenstein a écrit :
> 	I'm not sure you understand me. I'm talking about the person supposedly
> opting their own phone# in, who claims authority to do so. Not the
> person operating the service, who's generating and storing business
> records. How does the *opted-in callee* demonstrate their authority for
> registering a given phone#, other than claiming they have that authority
> in a Web form or email? Do they have to fax letterhead or something
> nonscaleable like that? Has this process been tested in any court? It
> really does sound like I'm volunteering to be the guinea pig, which is
> not my usual line of work.
>
>
> On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 12:53 -0700, trixter aka Bret McDanel wrote:
>   
>> On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:30 -0400, Matthew Rubenstein wrote:
>>     
>>> 	How do you demonstrate that the person who claimed authority in opting
>>> the phone# in has that authority? Is there any actual legal precedent
>>> showing the party collecting the unverified opt-in is not liable when
>>> someone opts in a phone# without authority? Or am I volunteering to be
>>> the guinea pig
>>>
>>>       
>> largely business records suffice, unless shown to be doctored its
>> generally ok.  There is a special requirement for computer recors,
>> specifically they must be used in the normal course of business.  This
>> is really getting into lawyer land, and lawyers wont give generic advice
>> as a lawyer becuase there are specifics that generally need to be looked
>> at, and if they do it as a lawyer then they take on a certain amount of
>> liability (malpractice if its bad info).
>>