[asterisk-biz] RE: Bottom end of the market for an Asterisk PBX ?

[Erick Perez]

I have something to say to my own comment:
Using audiocodes equipment will sure give me more asterisk stability
than making 185 IPPhones bang my asterisk machine all day.

On 7/6/06, Erick Perez <eaperezh at gmail.com> wrote:
> People always talk about cheap products, but they do not consider an
> important factor. There are countries (like mine) that will *not* pay
> USD 150.00 for a phone in a company with less than 20 or 30 users.
>
> An Example:
> I work for a bank that has 185 analog extensions and about 20 digital
> connected to an old, very old, norstar PBX. Analog extensions like the
> one I use are cheap Panasonic phone (handset+base, and buttons 0-9,
> *,#) that costs 16 dollars per unit in quantities below 10 units.
>
> When I tried to talk about an asterisk setup in my office, they looked
> and said "how much will it costs?". When I talked about snom 300
> phones at 185 per unit they looked at me and ask me if i could do it
> with cheap panasonic phones. An AudioCodes MP124 (24fxs, SIP,
> g729,g711) is about 1500 (about $62 per port), so total analog
> implementation was about $80 per port (panasonic+audiocodes).
>
> Sure, that implementation wont beat a snom 300, but sure gets the work done.
>
> That's why some of us still use cheapo equipment like grandstream or
> the like, because some of us can't affort a 150-300 phone. Unless
> you're the big-chief and the company pays you an executive phone.
> BTW snom 300 can pass as executive phones down here.
>
> cheers,
>
>
>
> On 7/6/06, shadowym <shadowym at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > While * may not be low end, * on a Dell Dimension or (insert your favorite
> > budget PC here) with X100P cards or cheap ATA's or cheap ? Using Grandstream
> > phones or (insert your favorite budget SIP phone here) certainly is low end.
> >
> > There are MANY people on this list doing exactly that!  That is what is
> > perpetuating the image of low quality, not the software itself.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Alexander Lopez [mailto:Alex.Lopez at OpSys.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 6:23 AM
> > > To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion
> > > Subject: RE: [asterisk-biz] RE: Bottom end of the market for
> > > an Asterisk PBX ?
> > >
> > > Snip.
> > >
> > > > * is not low-end, in fact for our purposes, it is likely the
> > > highest-end
> > > > product that we found.  People have to stop confusing
> > > open-source with
> > > > low quality.  Do you consider Firefox a low-end browser?
> > > >
> > > > W
> > >
> > > Or Linux a low-end OS?, Open-Source is a toolkit, once in a
> > > while you are able to find a well-made multi-function tool,
> > > but if you realize that while you may not have the exact tool
> > > you need, you have all the raw materials and full run and
> > > access to the machine shop.
> > >
> > > On a downside your machine shop tends to reconfigure itself
> > > every once in a while, as others come in and add/change the
> > > tools!! But unlike closed-source options at least you can see
> > > the changes!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
> >
> > asterisk-biz mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
> >
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Erick Perez
> Panama Sistemas
> Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos
> Panama, Republica de Panama
> Cel Panama. +(507) 6694-4780
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Erick Perez
Panama Sistemas
Integradores de Telefonia IP y Soluciones Para Centros de Datos
Panama, Republica de Panama
Cel Panama. +(507) 6694-4780
------------------------------------------------------------