[Fwd: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Sangoma A104D Shipping Soon] Correction to last statement

[Matt Florell]

That used to be true before Digium released their version 2 firmware. Since
then I have done performance tests comparing the Digium TE405Pv2 with the
Sangoma a104u and they perform very close to each other and the Digium card
performs slightly better on RBS T1s than the Sangoma card.

More details in the review:
http://astguiclient.blogspot.com/2005/09/digium-405p-v2-review.html

I have recently put my test TE406P(Digium echo-can card) in production and
am awaiting an a104D from Sangoma to test as well. I will put the review up
after running them both for a couple weeks, hopefully in November some time.

MATT---

On 10/18/05, Cory Andrews <Cory at voipsupply.com> wrote:
>
> I should not say the on-board resources "alleviate" the load on the host
> CPU, but rather, they "lessen" the load. I think integrators who
> use Sangoma products would agree you can run them on a slightly more
> lean CPU/RAM config than you'd want to use for a similar Digium board.
>
> --
> Cory Andrews
> Senior Partner
> +++++++++++
> VOIPSupply.com
> 454 Sonwil Drive
> Buffalo, NY 14225
> +++++++++++
> voice - 716.630.1555 X22
> email - Cory at VOIPSupply.com
> fax - 716.630.1548
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Cory Andrews <Cory at VOIPSupply.com>
> To: Commercial and Business-Oriented Asterisk Discussion <
> asterisk-biz at lists.digium.com>
> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:06 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-biz] Sangoma A104D Shipping Soon
> I'd imagine your standard Asterisk config would work. Intel P4 3.0 GHZ,
> 512MB-1GB of RAM. The Sangoma's do a lot of the "heavy lifting" on the
> board, which alleviates the load for the host CPU. I'm sure we'll see
> some benchmarking on these soon.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-biz/attachments/20051018/1eb3314f/attachment.htm