[asterisk-app-dev] Channel indications

[David M. Lee]

On Oct 21, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Joshua Colp <jcolp at digium.com> wrote:

> Paul Belanger wrote:
>> For the sake consistency I'd like to see us pick one.  I can go either
>> way, but the more I think about it
>> 
>> /indicate?name=answer
>> /indicate?name=hold
>> /indicate?name=busy
>> 
>> would give us a cleaner API for channels.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
> 
> I agree that the hold stuff should go into indicate but I'm torn on moving answer there because having it separate makes the API more approachable by non-telephony developers. They probably don't know about indications and may not even ever need to. They do know what answer is though right off the bat.

+1

> (That's personal preference, as I favor a balance of clean/approachable/logical when it comes to API design).

-- 
David M. Lee
Digium, Inc. | Software Developer
445 Jan Davis Drive NW - Huntsville, AL 35806 - USA
Check us out at:  www.digium.com  & www.asterisk.org