[zaptel-commits] tzafrir: trunk r1289 - /trunk/xpp/xpp_zap.c
zaptel-commits at lists.digium.com
zaptel-commits at lists.digium.com
Wed Aug 9 20:26:12 MST 2006
Author: tzafrir
Date: Wed Aug 9 22:26:12 2006
New Revision: 1289
URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel?rev=1289&view=rev
Log:
Solves spinlock-panic in CentOS 4.
zt_transmit() was called in spinlock protected context. However, it may
call back our hook setting code which tries to lock the same spinlock.
As a safeguard, the same logic was applied to zt_receive().
Modified:
trunk/xpp/xpp_zap.c
Modified: trunk/xpp/xpp_zap.c
URL: http://svn.digium.com/view/zaptel/trunk/xpp/xpp_zap.c?rev=1289&r1=1288&r2=1289&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- trunk/xpp/xpp_zap.c (original)
+++ trunk/xpp/xpp_zap.c Wed Aug 9 22:26:12 2006
@@ -903,7 +903,13 @@
} else {
w = writechunk = xpd->writechunk + ZT_CHUNKSIZE * CHANNELS_PERXPD /* + 1 */;
}
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xpd->lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * This should be out of spinlocks, as it may call back our hook setting
+ * methods
+ */
zt_transmit(&xpd->span);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&xpd->lock, flags);
for (i = 0; i < channels; i++) {
if (xpd->delay_until_dialtone[i] > 0) {
@@ -1011,8 +1017,12 @@
memcpy(xpd->ec_chunk1[i], chans[i].writechunk, ZT_CHUNKSIZE);
}
#endif
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xpd->lock, flags);
+ /*
+ * This should be out of spinlocks, as it may call back our hook setting
+ * methods
+ */
zt_receive(&xpd->span);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xpd->lock, flags);
}
static int xpp_startup(struct zt_span *span)
More information about the zaptel-commits
mailing list