[test-results] [Bamboo] Asterisk Testing > Asterisk 1.8 Branch > #666 has FAILED (3 tests failed, 2 failures were new). Change made by Russell Bryant.

[Bamboo]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Asterisk Testing > Asterisk 1.8 Branch > #666 failed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Code has been updated by Russell Bryant.
1/2 jobs failed, with 3 failing tests, 2 failures were new.

http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/TESTING-ASTERISK18BRANCH-666/


--------------
Failing Jobs
--------------
  - Asterisk 1.8 CentOS 6 32-Bit (CentOS 6): 3 of 222 tests failed.



--------------
Code Changes
--------------
Russell Bryant (393928):

>astobj2-ify the SLA code
>
>The SLA code within app_meetme was written before asotbj2 had been
>merged into Asterisk.  Worse, support for reloads did not exist at first
>and was added later as a bolt-on feature.  I knew at the time that
>reloading was not safe at all while SLA was in use, so the reload would
>be queued up to execute when the system was idle.  Unfortunately, this
>approach was still prone to errors beyond the fact that this was the
>only place in Asterisk where configuration was not reloaded
>instantly when requested.
>
>This patch converts various SLA objects to be reference counted objects
>using astobj2.  This allows reloads to be processed while the system is
>in use.  The code ensures that the objects will not disappear while one
>of the other threads is using them.  However, they will be immediately
>removed from the global trunk and station containers so no new calls
>will use them if removed from configuration.
>
>Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/2581/
>



--------------
Tests
--------------
New Test Failures (2)
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/channels/local/local call
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/channels/local/local app
Existing Test Failures (1)
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/channels/ s i p/sip hold

--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20130709/cf17a487/attachment-0001.htm>