[test-results] [Bamboo] Asterisk Testing > Asterisk 10 Branch > #204 has FAILED (1 tests failed). Change made by Mark Michelson.
Bamboo
bamboo at asterisk.org
Mon May 14 16:09:40 CDT 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Asterisk Testing > Asterisk 10 Branch > #204 failed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Code has been updated by Mark Michelson.
1/211 tests failed.
http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/TESTING-ASTERISK10BRANCH-204/
--------------
Failing Jobs
--------------
- Asterisk CentOS 6 64-Bit (CentOS 6): 1 of 211 tests failed.
--------------
Code Changes
--------------
Mark Michelson (366390):
>Fix broken reinvite glare scenario.
>
>To make a long story short, reinvite glares were broken
>because Asterisk would invert the To and From headers
>when ACKing a 491 response.
>
>The reason was because the initreq of the dialog was being
>changed to the incoming glared reinvite instead of being
>set to the outgoing glared reinvite. This change has three
>parts
>
>* In handle_incoming, we never will reject an ACK because it
>has a to-tag present, even if we think the request may be out
>of dialog.
>* In handle_request_invite, we do not change the initreq when
>receiving a reinvite to which we will respond with a 491.
>* In handle_request_invite, several superflous settings up
>pendinginvite have been removed since this is dones automatically
>by transmit_response_reliable
>
>Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1911
>........
>
>Merged revisions 366389 from http://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8
>
--------------
Tests
--------------
New Test Failures (1)
- AsteriskTestSuite: S/channels/ s i p/sip cause
--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20120514/82964434/attachment.htm>
More information about the Test-results
mailing list