[test-results] [Bamboo] Asterisk Testing > Asterisk 1.8 Branch > #20 has FAILED. Change made by Mark Michelson.

[Bamboo]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Asterisk Testing > Asterisk 1.8 Branch > #20 failed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Code has been updated by Mark Michelson.
1/2 jobs failed, with 0 failing tests.

http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/TESTING-ASTERISK18BRANCH-20/


--------------
Failing Jobs
--------------
  - Asterisk 1.8 CentOS 6 32-Bit (CentOS 6): No tests found.


--------------
Code Changes
--------------
Mark Michelson (357760):

>Second attempt to get optimal translation paths when codec_resample is used.
>
>This borrows code heavily from changes made in translation code in Asterisk 10.
>This uses the quality and sample rate change of translation in order to pick
>paths rather than the computational cost of translations. Computational cost
>is used solely in determining if a single translation step from a specific
>translator is better than the same translation step provided by a different
>translator.
>
>(closes issue ASTERISK-16821)
>reported by Andrew Lindh
>
>Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1772
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20120302/67dff149/attachment.htm>