[test-results] [Bamboo] Asterisk Testing > Asterisk 1.8 Branch > #264 has FAILED. Change made by elguero.
Bamboo
bamboo at asterisk.org
Tue Jun 19 21:08:13 CDT 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Asterisk Testing > Asterisk 1.8 Branch > #264 failed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Code has been updated by elguero.
No failed tests found, a possible compilation error.
http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/TESTING-ASTERISK18BRANCH-264/
--------------
Failing Jobs
--------------
- Asterisk 1.8 CentOS 6 64-Bit (CentOS 6): No tests found.
--------------
Code Changes
--------------
elguero (369108):
>Fix NULL pointer segfault in ast_sockaddr_parse()
>
>While working with ast_parse_arg() to perform a validity check, a segfault
>occurred. The segfault occurred due to passing a NULL pointer to
>ast_sockaddr_parse() from ast_parse_arg(). According to the documentation in
>config.h, "result pointer to the result. NULL is valid here, and can be used to
>perform only the validity checks."
>
>This patch fixes the segfault by checking for a NULL pointer. This patch also
>adds documentation to netsock2.h about why it is necessary to check for a NULL
>pointer.
>
>(Closes issue ASTERISK-20006)
>Reported by: Michael L. Young
>Tested by: Michael L. Young
>Patches:
>asterisk-20006-netsock-null-ptr.diff uploaded by Michael L. Young (license 5026)
>
>Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1990/
>
--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20120619/85ed87fe/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Test-results
mailing list