[test-results] [Bamboo] No agents to build plan Asterisk - 1.8 - Compile - Tarball

[Bamboo]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AST18-COMPILE-TARBALL-129 has been queued, but there's no agent capable of building it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/AST18-COMPILE-TARBALL/log

--------------
Code Changes
--------------
mmichelson (368625):

>Fix a specific scenario where ACKs are not matched.
>
>If a dialog-starting INVITE contains a to-tag, then Asterisk
>will respond with a 481. In this case, the resulting incoming
>ACK would not be matched, so Asterisk would continue retransmitting
>the 481 until the transaction times out.
>
>There were two issues. Asterisk, upon creating a sip_pvt would generate
>a local tag. However, when the time came to transmit the 481, since there
>was a to-tag in the INVITE, Asterisk would place this original to-tag
>in the 481 response. When the ACK came in, Asterisk would attempt to
>match the to-tag in the ACK to the generated local tag. Unfortunately,
>Asterisk never actually transmitted a response with the generated local
>tag, so the to-tag in the ACK would not match.
>
>The other problem was that when the 481 was sent, nothing was set
>on the sip_pvt to indicate what CSeq is expected in the ACK.
>
>To fix the first problem, we zero out the to-tag seen in the incoming
>INVITE. This way, Asterisk, when time to send a response, will send
>its generated local tag instead.
>
>To fix the second problem, we set the sip_pvt's pendinginvite to the
>CSeq of the INVITE when we send a 481.
>
>(closes issue ASTERISK-19892)
>Reported by Mark Michelson
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20120606/6ea2dcda/attachment.htm>