[test-results] [Bamboo] No agents to build plan Asterisk - Trunk - FreeBSD 8.1 - i386

[Bamboo]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASTTRUNK-FREEBSD81-I386-369 has been queued, but there's no agent capable of building it.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/ASTTRUNK-FREEBSD81-I386/log

--------------
Code Changes
--------------
rmudgett (339627):

>Merged revisions 339626 via svnmerge from 
>https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/10
>
>................
>  r339626 | rmudgett | 2011-10-06 12:53:00 -0500 (Thu, 06 Oct 2011) | 25 lines
>  
>  Merged revisions 339625 via svnmerge from 
>  https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8
>  
>  ........
>    r339625 | rmudgett | 2011-10-06 12:49:38 -0500 (Thu, 06 Oct 2011) | 18 lines
>    
>    Fix debugging messages generated by 'udptl debug'.
>    
>    * Makes chan_sip set the tag to the channel name.
>    
>    * Fixes received debug message sequence number.
>    
>    * Removed tx/rx debug message type since it was hard coded to 0.
>    
>    * Made udptl.c logged message header consistent if possible: "UDPTL (%s): ".
>    
>    * Removed unused rx_expected_seq_no from struct ast_udptl.
>    
>    (closes issue ASTERISK-18401)
>    Reported by: Kevin P. Fleming
>    Patches:
>          jira_asterisk_18401_v1.8.patch (license #5621) patch uploaded by rmudgett
>    Tested by: Matthew Nicholson
>  ........
>................
>

wedhorn (339680):

>Fixed segfault on core stop gracefully.
>
>There was an issue that the cap and confcap pointers for each line and device
>were being memcpy'd so they all pointed to the same ast_format_cap. On
>destroying, a segfault occured on the second call to the same struct.
>
>skinny reload now works again as well.
>
>Tested by snuff and myself. 
>


--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20111006/630ebf82/attachment.htm>