[test-results] [Bamboo] Asterisk - Trunk > FreeBSD 8.1 > #287 has FAILED (1 tests failed, no failures were new). Change made by 6 authors.
Bamboo
bamboo at asterisk.org
Wed Jul 20 16:20:56 CDT 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Asterisk - Trunk > FreeBSD 8.1 > #287 failed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This build occurred because it is a dependant of ASTTRUNK-LUCID-778.
1/122 tests failed, no failures were new.
http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/ASTTRUNK-FREEBSD81-287/
--------------
Failing Jobs
--------------
- i386 (Default Stage): 1 of 122 tests failed.
--------------
Code Changes
--------------
kmoore (328937):
>Merged revisions 328936 via svnmerge from
>https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/2.0
>
>................
> r328936 | kmoore | 2011-07-20 14:01:37 -0500 (Wed, 20 Jul 2011) | 15 lines
>
> Merged revisions 328935 via svnmerge from
> https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8
>
> ........
> r328935 | kmoore | 2011-07-20 14:00:23 -0500 (Wed, 20 Jul 2011) | 8 lines
>
> Inband DTMF regression
>
> The functionality of inband DTMF in chan_sip relied upon
> ast_rtp_instance_dtmf_mode_get/set not working properly to avoid calling
> ast_rtp_instance_dtmf_begin/end on RTP streams with inband DTMF. According to
> documentation, ast_rtp_instance_dtmf_begin/end is meant only for RFC2833 DTMF,
> never inband. This fixes the regression introduced in revision 328823.
> ........
>................
>
kmoore (328825):
>Merged revisions 328824 via svnmerge from
>https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.10
>
>................
> r328824 | kmoore | 2011-07-19 13:05:21 -0500 (Tue, 19 Jul 2011) | 18 lines
>
> Merged revisions 328823 via svnmerge from
> https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8
>
> ........
> r328823 | kmoore | 2011-07-19 12:57:18 -0500 (Tue, 19 Jul 2011) | 11 lines
>
> RTP bridge away with inband DTMF and feature detection
>
> When deciding whether Asterisk was allowed to bridge the call away from the
> core, chan_sip did not take into account the usage of features on dialed
> channels that require monitoring of DTMF on channels utilizing inband DTMF.
> This would cause Asterisk to allow the call to be locally or remotely bridged,
> preventing access to the data required to detect activations of such features.
>
> (closes 17237)
> Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1302/
> ........
>................
>
Terry Wilson (328718):
>Merged revisions 328717 via svnmerge from
>https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.10
>
>................
> r328717 | twilson | 2011-07-18 20:55:32 -0500 (Mon, 18 Jul 2011) | 14 lines
>
> Merged revisions 328716 via svnmerge from
> https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.8
>
> ........
> r328716 | twilson | 2011-07-18 20:35:53 -0500 (Mon, 18 Jul 2011) | 7 lines
>
> Make AST_LIST_REMOVE safer
>
> AST_LIST_REMOVE shouldn't modify the element passed in if it isn't found. This
> commit also adds linked list unit tests.
>
> Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1321/
> ........
>................
>
--------------
Tests
--------------
Existing Test Failures (1)
- AsteriskUnitTests: /main/netsock2/parsing
--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20110720/05d57b31/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Test-results
mailing list