[test-results] [Bamboo] Asterisk - 10 > Ubuntu Lucid (10.04) > #390 has FAILED (4 tests failed, 1 failures were new). Change made by jrose.

[Bamboo]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Asterisk - 10 > Ubuntu Lucid (10.04) > #390 failed.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Code has been updated by jrose.
4/182 tests failed, 1 failure was new.

http://bamboo.asterisk.org/browse/AST10-LUCID-390/


--------------
Failing Jobs
--------------
  - amd64 (Default Stage): 4 of 182 tests failed.


--------------
Code Changes
--------------
jrose (347656):

>Fix regressed behavior of queue set penalty to work without specifying 'in <queuename>'
>
>r325483 caused a regression in Asterisk 10+ that would make Asterisk segfault when
>attempting to set penalty on an interface without specifying a queue in the queue set
>penalty CLI command. In addition, no attempt would be made whatsoever to perform the
>penalty setting on all the queues in the core list with either the cli command or the
>non-segfaulting ami equivalent. This patch fixes that and also makes an attempt to
>document and rename some functions required by this command to better represent what
>they actually do. Oh yeah, and the use of this command without specifying a specific
>queue actually works now.
>
>Review: https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/1609/
>


--------------
Tests
--------------
New Test Failures (1)
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/apps/voicemail/check voicemail options record busy
Existing Test Failures (3)
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/channels/ s i p/sip tls register
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/channels/ s i p/sip tls call
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/fax/gateway mix2
Fixed Tests (2)
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/apps/voicemail/leave voicemail priority
   - AsteriskTestSuite: S/queues/queue baseline

--
This message is automatically generated by Atlassian Bamboo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/test-results/attachments/20111209/67b44d60/attachment.htm>