[libpri-commits] rmudgett: tag 1.4.11.4 r1939 - in /tags/1.4.11.4: rose_qsig_name.c rosetest.c

[SVN commits to the libpri project]

Author: rmudgett
Date: Mon Aug 30 17:13:16 2010
New Revision: 1939

URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/libpri?view=rev&rev=1939
Log:
Merged revisions 1828 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/libpri/branches/1.4

........
  r1828 | rmudgett | 2010-07-16 11:37:07 -0500 (Fri, 16 Jul 2010) | 18 lines
  
  Calling name not successfully processed on inbound QSIG PRI calls from Mitel PBX
  
  The alternate form of the Q.SIG Name sequence that allows manufacturer
  extensions for CallingName, CalledName, ConnectedName, and BusyName was
  not consuming the next ASN.1 tag.  The code that processed the ASN.1 Name
  structure was then using a stale tag value.  The stale tag value was then
  rejected with the "Did not expect" message.
  
  I have added a test case using the supplied PRI debug output to the
  rosetest utility to verify that this alternate encoding is tested in the
  future.
  
  (closes issue #17619)
  Reported by: jims8650
  Patches:
        issue17619_v1.4.11.3.patch uploaded by rmudgett (license 664)
  Tested by: rmudgett
........

Modified:
    tags/1.4.11.4/rose_qsig_name.c
    tags/1.4.11.4/rosetest.c

Modified: tags/1.4.11.4/rose_qsig_name.c
URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/libpri/tags/1.4.11.4/rose_qsig_name.c?view=diff&rev=1939&r1=1938&r2=1939
==============================================================================
--- tags/1.4.11.4/rose_qsig_name.c (original)
+++ tags/1.4.11.4/rose_qsig_name.c Mon Aug 30 17:13:16 2010
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@
 		ASN1_CALL(pos, asn1_dec_length(pos, end, &length));
 		ASN1_END_SETUP(seq_end, seq_offset, length, pos, end);
 
+		ASN1_CALL(pos, asn1_dec_tag(pos, seq_end, &tag));
 		ASN1_CALL(pos, rose_dec_qsig_Name(ctrl, "name", tag, pos, seq_end,
 			&party->name));
 

Modified: tags/1.4.11.4/rosetest.c
URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/libpri/tags/1.4.11.4/rosetest.c?view=diff&rev=1939&r1=1938&r2=1939
==============================================================================
--- tags/1.4.11.4/rosetest.c (original)
+++ tags/1.4.11.4/rosetest.c Mon Aug 30 17:13:16 2010
@@ -2132,6 +2132,44 @@
 /* *INDENT-ON* */
 };
 
+static unsigned char rose_qsig_name_alt_encode_msg[] = {
+/* *INDENT-OFF* */
+/*
+ *	Context Specific/C [10 0x0A] <AA> Len:6 <06>
+ *		Context Specific [0 0x00] <80> Len:1 <01>
+ *			<00> - "~"
+ *		Context Specific [2 0x02] <82> Len:1 <01>
+ *			<00> - "~"
+ *	Context Specific [11 0x0B] <8B> Len:1 <01>
+ *		<00> - "~"
+ *	Context Specific/C [1 0x01] <A1> Len:21 <15>
+ *		Integer(2 0x02) <02> Len:1 <01>
+ *			<1D> - "~"
+ *		Integer(2 0x02) <02> Len:1 <01>
+ *			<00> - "~"
+ *		Sequence/C(48 0x30) <30> Len:13 <0D>
+ *			Context Specific [0 0x00] <80> Len:11 <0B>
+ *				<55 54 49 4C 49 54 59 20-54 45 4C> - "UTILITY TEL"
+ */
+	0x9F,
+	0xAA, 0x06,
+		0x80, 0x01,
+			0x00,
+		0x82, 0x01,
+			0x00,
+		0x8B, 0x01,
+			0x00,
+	0xA1, 0x15,
+		0x02, 0x01,
+			0x1D,
+		0x02, 0x01,
+			0x00,
+		0x30, 0x0D,
+			0x80, 0x0B,
+				0x55, 0x54, 0x49, 0x4C, 0x49, 0x54, 0x59, 0x20, 0x54, 0x45, 0x4C
+/* *INDENT-ON* */
+};
+
 
 static const struct rose_message rose_dms100_msgs[] = {
 /* *INDENT-OFF* */
@@ -2420,6 +2458,9 @@
 	rose_test_exception(&dummy_ctrl, "Multiple component messages",
 		rose_qsig_multiple_msg, sizeof(rose_qsig_multiple_msg));
 
+	rose_test_exception(&dummy_ctrl, "Alternate name encoded messages",
+		rose_qsig_name_alt_encode_msg, sizeof(rose_qsig_name_alt_encode_msg));
+
 /* ------------------------------------------------------------------- */
 
 	pri_message(&dummy_ctrl, "\n\n"