[Dundi] DUNDi GPA, Section 2(f)

[Mark Spencer]

Presumably, if you had permission to expose or describe a route from a peer, 
and that route was not received by that peer from someone else through the 
peering network, then that would represent a separate permission outside of
the GPA and would not be covered since it really isn't being handled through
the peering network.  A simple test would be "Is this something I would have the
capability and authorization to do if I don't have access to the peering network 
at all?" and if the answer is yes, then it is unlikely to be in conflict with the GPA.

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Messina" <amessina at messinet.com>
To: dundi at lists.digium.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:29:04 AM (GMT-0600) America/Guatemala
Subject: [Dundi] DUNDi GPA, Section 2(f)

Hello, I'm hoping someone will help me be able to answer a question about the 
GPA Section 2(f) which deal with the sharing of Routes, Service and 
Participant information.

Does this section mean that I am not able to say (on a public webpage for 
example):

"There is a peer in Some Town, USA which terminates E.164 numbers in the 
+1777NXXXXXX area code space?"

Does the same apply, even if I have the permission of that peer to do so?

So you can see what I have done currently to work around this, visit 
http://messinet.com/project/dundi

Thanks for your help.
-- 
Anthony -  http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E