[Dundi] Dundi w/ 1.0

[Mark Spencer]

Okay so to illustrate...

The core tier 1 people will all be exchanging *most* call setups.  The 
challenge is to try to trim off as many branches as possible and to reduce 
as much as possible the number of queries that have to go deep into the 
tree.  To this end, it is beneficial to have numbers which are similar 
(e.g. all Netherlands numbers) behind a one or more tier 1 / tier 2 nodes. 
Note that the protocol is designed to handle *any* graph and any 
distribution of numbers, but certain orientations are more effective in 
the value they bring to the cache and in their ability to block off large 
chunks of the tree.

Mark

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Greg Boehnlein wrote:

> On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Brian West wrote:
>
>> Let me get asterlink setup then we need to figure out the best method for
>> peering.  We are going to be a tier 1 peer.  So I should only peer with tier
>> 1 and tier 2 peers.  We need to setup bandwidth requirements and peering
>> arrangements that will setup how this peering arrangement will be.
>>
>> Here is my thoughts:
>>
>> Tier 1:
>> Primary peers with loads of bandwidth!?!?
>> Only peers to T1 or T2 peers.
>> Service Provider Level?!?
>>
>> Tier 2:
>> Secondary peers with atleast 50% of the bandwidth their T1 has
>> Only peers with T2 and T3 peers
>>
>> Tier 3:
>> Peers with atleast 50% of the bandwidth their T2 has.
>> Peers with T2 and customer/endusers and other T3's
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
> Yeah.. I've got loads of bandwidth, and termination/origination services
> (SIP and IAX). Not sure wether I'd qualify as the Tier 1 provider, but
> what exactly does that commitment mean?
>
>
>
> --
>    Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
>         http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
>                             KP-216-121-ST
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dundi mailing list
> Dundi at lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/dundi
>