[dahdi-commits] sruffell: linux/trunk r9607 - /linux/trunk/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c
SVN commits to the DAHDI project
dahdi-commits at lists.digium.com
Mon Jan 3 18:28:10 UTC 2011
Author: sruffell
Date: Mon Jan 3 12:28:06 2011
New Revision: 9607
URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/dahdi?view=rev&rev=9607
Log:
dahdi: Drop 'chans' reference in chan_from_num.
Part of getting rid of global chans array. We need to search the list
of spans and the list of pseudo channels. While this is slower than a
direct index into a 'chans' array, the places where this function is
called are not in the 'hot' path but instead part of channel
configuration and conferencing setup.
Signed-off-by: Shaun Ruffell <sruffell at digium.com>
Acked-by: Kinsey Moore <kmoore at digium.com>
Modified:
linux/trunk/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c
Modified: linux/trunk/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c
URL: http://svnview.digium.com/svn/dahdi/linux/trunk/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c?view=diff&rev=9607&r1=9606&r2=9607
==============================================================================
--- linux/trunk/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c (original)
+++ linux/trunk/drivers/dahdi/dahdi-base.c Mon Jan 3 12:28:06 2011
@@ -476,9 +476,54 @@
static struct dahdi_chan *chans[DAHDI_MAX_CHANNELS];
-static inline struct dahdi_chan *chan_from_num(unsigned int channo)
-{
- return valid_channo(channo) ? chans[channo] : NULL;
+static struct dahdi_chan *chan_from_num(unsigned int channo)
+{
+ struct dahdi_span *s;
+ struct pseudo_chan *pseudo;
+
+ if (!unlikely(valid_channo(channo)))
+ return NULL;
+
+ mutex_lock(®istration_mutex);
+
+ /* When searching for the channel amongst the spans, we can use the
+ * fact that channels on a span must be numbered consecutively to skip
+ * checking each individual channel. */
+ list_for_each_entry(s, &span_list, node) {
+ unsigned int basechan;
+ struct dahdi_chan *chan;
+
+ if (unlikely(!s->channels))
+ continue;
+
+ basechan = s->chans[0]->channo;
+ if (channo >= (basechan + s->channels))
+ continue;
+
+ if (unlikely(channo < basechan)) {
+ /* Looks like they are asking for a channel that has
+ * already been removed. */
+ mutex_unlock(®istration_mutex);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ chan = s->chans[channo - basechan];
+ WARN_ON(chan->channo != channo);
+ mutex_unlock(®istration_mutex);
+ return chan;
+ }
+
+ /* If we didn't find the channel on the list of real channels, then
+ * it's most likely a pseudo channel. */
+ list_for_each_entry(pseudo, &pseudo_chans, node) {
+ if (pseudo->chan.channo == channo) {
+ mutex_unlock(®istration_mutex);
+ return &pseudo->chan;
+ }
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(®istration_mutex);
+ return NULL;
}
static inline struct dahdi_chan *chan_from_file(struct file *file)
More information about the dahdi-commits
mailing list