<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dne 13.8.2015 v 17:20 Rusty Newton
napsal(a):<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAGWDFcvyFuUP1Fa_9dLmCEkWp_cRJ8MMiwgEAH1CU=Qo+=FHHA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:54 AM,
Marek Červenka <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:cervajs@fpf.slu.cz"
target="_blank">cervajs@fpf.slu.cz</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">hello,<br>
<br>
is it possible simultaneously use chan_sip and chan_pjsip?<br>
<br>
if yes, can you recommend settings<br>
<br>
i'm thinking about<br>
- chan_sip - for sip hardphones/softphones (sip udp 5060)<br>
- chan_pjsip - for webrtc</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>You can use both.. you will want to make sure your bind
addresses and ports don't conflict.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Why not use chan_pjsip for all SIP connectivity?</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
because it's BIG change for production environment<br>
we have own web gui for config generation and we need move to
chan_pjsip safely<br>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
---------------------------------------
Marek Cervenka
=======================================
</pre>
</body>
</html>