<div>Added two new features to the script: Timeout value and speechdata type.</div><div><br></div><div><b>exten => s,n,agi(speech-recog.agi,en-US,3000,phoneNumb)</b></div><div>- Will listen for 3 seconds and sanitize return as a single number without any spaces in between. This helps when one reads phone number in format 415-554-2323 and google returns, "415 554 2323" as result which is not very usable.</div>
<div><br></div><div><b>exten => s,n,agi(speech-recog.agi,en-US,20000,string)</b></div><div>- Will listen for 20 second and return result as provided by Google untouched.</div><div><br></div><div>It would be great to see them in future versions as I seem to need them dearly in a real life scenario.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Updated script attached.</div><div><br></div><div>-Bruce</div><div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Bruce B <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruceb444@gmail.com">bruceb444@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">NVM. I explored the code and see the logic. I had sox = 1 so it was failing on RHEL.<div><br></div><div>To report, my cell phone from a PRI gets same confidence level just like SIP. Building my control app now. Should make my life much easier while driving. Thanks again :-)</div>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<div><br></div></font></span><div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">-Bruce</font></span><div><div class="h5"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:50 PM, Bruce B <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bruceb444@gmail.com" target="_blank">bruceb444@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Thanks.<div><br></div><div>I have been testing Aastra phones with SIP and had great results. I am testing my cell phone now and sometimes get "-1" for id, status, utterance, and confidence. What does that mean?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Cheers<div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Lefteris Zafiris <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:zaf.000@gmail.com" target="_blank">zaf.000@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 20:46:14 -0500<br>
Bruce B <<a href="mailto:bruceb444@gmail.com" target="_blank">bruceb444@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
> Does sox have more features on a Debian system than RHEL? Is that why<br>
> it won't work on RHEL?<br>
><br>
</div>RHEL's 5 version of sox is really old and outdated. The command syntax<br>
and the switches are totally different compared to recent versions of<br>
sox.<br>
Anyway I'm not sure audio normalization and the rest we use sox for is<br>
really needed. My tests so far didn't show any improvements in<br>
detection rates. Keep in mind that all this is still WIP and the<br>
option to use sox is more for testing than for serious use.<br>
<div><div><br>
----------------<br>
Lefteris Zafiris<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
_____________________________________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br>
<a href="http://www.asterisk.org/hello" target="_blank">http://www.asterisk.org/hello</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br>