<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
On 11/28/2011 3:35 PM, Danny Nicholas wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:022801ccae0d$4415d0b0$cc417210$@debsinc.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">If
you put a gun to my head I would say to stay with Centos 5
and either 1.4.42 or 10.0.0-rc2. 10.0.0-rc2 removes a
“feature” that was killing me in 1.4, but if you aren’t
doing IVR stuff, you can stay with what you know. Another
thing to consider though; 1.4.8 is prior to the
Zaptel-to-Dahdi conversion so that might cause you some
“joy”.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"">
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>
[<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com">mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Todd Routhier<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, November 28, 2011 2:31 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [asterisk-users] Recommendations<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am currently running Asterisk 1.4.8 and
have been for quite a while, it has served me well.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Getting ready to build a new box to
replace the existing installation of Asterisk.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">My primary use of the Asterisk box is run
queues. I am sure the queue features and functionality have
been updated, expanded since 1.4.8 and I am wondering what
version of Ast you guys would recommend. Looking for the
best version in terms of queue features, functionality.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Also, an OS recommendation would be
great. Been running on CentOS forever and no reason to want
to change. Just looking for the best version of CentOS to
run the best/stable version of Asterisk on.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">To be clear:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Recommended:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Asterisk Version:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">OS & Version:<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I am even thinking about using
AsteriskNow, don't need the FreePBX but I have worked with
it before and it used to be possible to still do custom
stuff and co-exist with FreePBX. I like having FreePBX
available for the simple stuff so it's not a bad thing if
it's there. Does it have an intergrated web server that I
could run a lightweight control panel on? That would be
another plus.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thanks in advance for any help, been out
of touch for a while. I will be doing my research and lots
of reading over the next few days but thought it couldn't
hurt to see what the general consensus is on these topics.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
Danny,<br>
Can you expand on what "feature" 10.0.0-rc2 removed that was causing
you problems with IVR? I am starting to undertake some major IVR
scripting so am rather curious.<br>
Thanks,<br>
JohnM<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>