<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Thanks Leif,<br><br>I had changed it to res_timing_dahdi and since last few days it seem good. <br><br>-S<br><br>> Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 15:48:03 -0400<br>> From: leif.madsen@asteriskdocs.org<br>> To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com<br>> Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] res_timing_timerfd.so Vs res_timing_dahdi.so<br>> <br>> On 11-05-13 11:39 AM, isrlgb@gmail.com wrote:<br>> > I haven't tried with timerfd but with timer pthread 1.8 is very unstable <br>> > <br>> > I think I have seen a post to the list from kevin fleming that the same is for timerfd that there is a nasty bug which they haven't found the reason for yet<br>> <br>> My experience is that you should pretty much always use res_timing_dahdi unless<br>> you're on a platform on which you can't install DAHDI. You don't need any<br>> hardware to use timing from DAHDI because timing is generated by the kernel.<br>> <br>> My order of preference for stability is:<br>> <br>> * res_timing_dahdi<br>> * res_timing_timerfd<br>> * res_timing pthread<br>> <br>> The timerfd and pthread modules are relatively new, and sometimes people run<br>> into stability problems while using them. If you can use res_timing_dahdi I<br>> recommend you do so.<br>> <br>> Leif.<br>> <br>> --<br>> _____________________________________________________________________<br>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --<br>> New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br>> http://www.asterisk.org/hello<br>> <br>> asterisk-users mailing list<br>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users<br> </body>
</html>