1.2 is not active either.<br><br>Both are solid.<br><br>I am loving SNOM phones and OpenVPN software. Only port(s) open is what I assign to OpenVPN. <br><br>CallWeaver was way ahead of asterisk at the time but you are right it died.<br>
<br>Generally, the newer, the worse. 1.2 was very solid except for a few strange things that could be worked around.<br><br>Newer versions have are like Fedora Core (or FC X) you are just testing beta software for Digium's commercial products.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Steve Totaro<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Douglas Mortensen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:doug@impalanetworks.com">doug@impalanetworks.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">Based on the following URL, it seems that CallWeaver may not still be an active project??<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.callweaver.org/blog/20" target="_blank">http://www.callweaver.org/blog/20</a><br>
<br>
>From a security standpoint, I would usually expect it is safer to be with an active project, than a dead one. Otherwise who is going to patch vulnerabilities? Not me. I'm not a software developer.<br>
<div class="im">-<br>
Doug Mortensen<br>
Network Consultant<br>
Impala Networks<br>
</div>P: 505.327.7300<br>
.<br>
<br>
From: Steve Totaro [mailto:<a href="mailto:stotaro@totarotechnologies.com">stotaro@totarotechnologies.com</a>]<br>
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM<br>
<div class="im">To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<br>
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk?<br>
<br>
<br>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Mortensen <<a href="mailto:doug@impalanetworks.com">doug@impalanetworks.com</a>> wrote:<br>
1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
-<br>
Doug Mortensen<br>
Network Consultant<br>
Impala Networks Inc<br>
CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+<br>
Linux+, Network+, Server+<br>
.<br>
<a href="http://www.impalanetworks.com" target="_blank">www.impalanetworks.com</a><br>
P: (505) 327-7300<br>
F: (505) 327-7545<br>
<br>
<br>
Callweaver? <a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver" target="_blank">http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver</a>. I believe they forked somewhere in the 1.2 release. Many features ahead of Asterisk.<br>
<br>
Although I didn't see anything on FreeSwitch stating anything anything about deadlocking, I know that was one of the main reasons for BKW, as seasoned asterisk developer and folks to start from scratch. That and the hybrid dual license in Asterisk.<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf</a><br>
<br>
Read the whole piece. I know it isn't Asterisk but BKW who contributed and I believe is still helping Asterisk<br>
<br>
Besides, I feel that FreeSwitch is the most stable.<br>
<br>
I like 1.2 so I went with Callweaver for many installations.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Steve Totaro<br>
<br>
</div></div><div><div></div><div class="h5">--<br>
_____________________________________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:<br>
<a href="http://www.asterisk.org/hello" target="_blank">http://www.asterisk.org/hello</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>