<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>I have been somewhat interested in FreeSwitch in the past, but I am mostly interested in Asterisk. That&#8217;s why I asked about stability of asterisk versions. Maybe some other time I&#8217;ll look deeper into FreeSwitch.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Thanks. And thanks everyone for the feedback.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#003300'>-<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#003300'>Doug Mortensen<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#003300'>Network Consultant<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#003300'>Impala Networks<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#003300'>P: 505.327.7300<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Steve Totaro [mailto:stotaro@totarotechnologies.com] <br><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:11 PM<br><b>To:</b> Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [asterisk-users] What is the most stable version of asterisk?<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Douglas Mortensen &lt;<a href="mailto:doug@impalanetworks.com" target="_blank">doug@impalanetworks.com</a>&gt; wrote:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'>1.2? 1.4? 1.6? 1.8?<br><br>Thanks,<br>-<br>Doug Mortensen<br>Network Consultant<br>Impala Networks Inc<br>CCNA, MCSA, Security+, A+<br>Linux+, Network+, Server+<br>.<br><a href="http://www.impalanetworks.com" target="_blank">www.impalanetworks.com</a><br>P: (505) 327-7300<br>F: (505) 327-7545<br><br><o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><br>Callweaver? &nbsp; <a href="http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver" target="_blank">http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/CallWeaver</a>.&nbsp; I believe they forked somewhere in the 1.2 release.&nbsp; Many features ahead of Asterisk.<br><br>Although I didn't see anything on FreeSwitch stating anything anything about deadlocking, I know that was one of the main reasons for BKW, as seasoned asterisk developer and folks to start from scratch.&nbsp; That and the hybrid dual license in Asterisk.<br><br><a href="http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.sofaswitch.org/docs/How%20does%20FreeSWITCH%20compare%20to%20Asterisk.pdf</a><br><br>Read the whole piece.&nbsp; I know it isn't Asterisk but BKW who contributed and I believe is still helping Asterisk<br><br>Besides, I feel that FreeSwitch is the most stable.<br><br>I like 1.2 so I went with Callweaver for many installations.<br><br>Thanks,<br>Steve Totaro <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></body></html>