<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
On 08/07/2010 01:11 AM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:unserossi@aol.com">unserossi@aol.com</a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:8CD03D3D731BBF9-1348-13B83@webmail-d101.sysops.aol.com"
type="cite"><font size="2" color="black" face="arial"><font size="2"
color="black" face="arial">
<div
style="font-family: arial,helvetica; font-size: 10pt; color: black;">
<div id="AOLMsgPart_0_13ceb4bb-32b6-4794-aa94-dda609f1a58a"
style="margin: 0px; font-family: Tahoma,Verdana,Arial,Sans-Serif; font-size: 12px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">
<pre style="font-size: 9pt;"><tt>
Why don't you use 'real' realtime meaning to have your sip peers in your database?
Then you would not have to do a reload after adding new peers to your db.
And you can still have sip peers additionally in sip.conf.
</tt></pre>
</div>
</div>
</font></font></blockquote>
<br>
I have all of my sip peers in a realtime database, that is not the
question ! The question is that I want the register-statements of
sip.conf in a realtime database.<br>
<br>
I've posted all the info to do so in my first post. But it conflicts
for some unknown reason with realtime SIP peers.<br>
<br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
Jonas.<br>
</body>
</html>