<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word"><head><META content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<meta content="Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)" name=Generator>
<style>
<!--
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:Arial;
color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
</head><BODY>
<DIV>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face=Arial size=2><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face=Arial size=2><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>I have an existing conference bridge running on Asterisk
1.4.2 using MeetMe and it’s been pretty much rock solid since it was
installed. We do around 460,000 minutes on it monthly and peak at about 150
simultaneous sip channels. I’m adding a second bridge for redundancy
purposes into another facility and would like to go with app_confbridge and
Solaris. Since it’s a relatively new app I have to question if it’s
been put to the test and whether I can expect the same kind of stability. <o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face=Arial size=2><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face=Arial size=2><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Does anyone use confbridge in a large installation and can
provide feedback on its stability, quality in comparison to MeetMe? I use a
sangoma card in my 1.4.2 box to provide timing and it has never been an issue.
Can I expect similar performance from the new timing API?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face=Arial size=2><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face=Arial size=2><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Thanks<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face=Arial size=2><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face=Arial size=2><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Bob</span></font> <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><font face="Times New Roman" size=3><span style='font-size:
12.0pt'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p>
</div>
</DIV>
<DIV>
<HR>
</DIV>
<DIV STYLE="FONT-SIZE: 9pt; FONT-FAMILY: Courier New">This email with all information contained herein or attached hereto may contain confidential and/or privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender and immediately delete this email in its entirety and any attachments thereto.</DIV></BODY></HTML>