Ok, I used Record with wav49 and, instead of recording in a good quality like Monitor, it was almost as bad as regular wav.<br><br>These things crack my head, now I'll have to switch all my Record for Monitor, somehow limiting time and in a way that # stops the recording. Should be fun.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/10/6 Danny Nicholas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:danny@debsinc.com">danny@debsinc.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div link="blue" vlink="blue" lang="EN-US">
<div>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">If you do Record(x.WAV) instead
record(x.wav) the output will be in WAV49 format.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;" align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%">
</span></font></div>
<p><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-weight: bold;">From:</span></font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma;">
<a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>] <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">On Behalf Of </span></b>Kim Delevati<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, October 06, 2009
1:08 PM<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [asterisk-users]
Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality</div></div></span></font></p>
</div><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 12pt;"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Adittional doubt: can I
use WAV49 on the Record() command? Voip-info doesnt say anything about it (or
the WAV listed there is equivalent to WAV49, being wav = WAV).</span></font></p>
<div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2009/10/6 Kim Delevati <<a href="mailto:kim.delevati@gmail.com" target="_blank">kim.delevati@gmail.com</a>></span></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hi!<br>
<br>
I tested with wav49 and now the quality is MUCH better. Almost the same as the
call. I dont know the reason, probably it was some problem on the decoding of
the codec I used to wav, strangely that doesnt happen with wav49.<br>
<br>
The quality now is very acceptable, whereas with wav I couldnt understand a
word. Also the files are much smaller, which is even better.<br>
<br>
Thank you all for you answers.</span></font></p>
<div>
<div>
<p style="margin-bottom: 12pt;"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
<div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2009/10/6 Danny Nicholas <<a href="mailto:danny@debsinc.com" target="_blank">danny@debsinc.com</a>></span></font></p>
<div link="blue" vlink="blue">
<div>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">WAV49 is by definition lesser quality but Louder sound, which
might help the perceived quality.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;" align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%">
</span></font></div>
<p><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-weight: bold;">From:</span></font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma;"> <a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>]
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">On Behalf Of </span></b>Kim Delevati<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, October 06, 2009
10:23 AM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> Asterisk
Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [asterisk-users]
Asterisk + Monitor() Poor quality</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 12pt;"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Doesnt WAV49 have worse quality than WAV? Or am I
wrong?<br>
<br>
On more info, I've tested it on calls using alaw, gsm, g729, and in all the
recording has poor quality.<br>
<br>
Tzafrir answered me talking about a debian patch for this issue, does anyone
know where to find it?</span></font></p>
<div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">2009/10/6
Danny Nicholas <<a href="mailto:danny@debsinc.com" target="_blank">danny@debsinc.com</a>></span></font></p>
<div link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;">I doubt AGI is the issue. You can verify this by
setting up a context to record a call without AGI. I’d try using the
WAV49 format instead of regular WAV.</span></font></p>
<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;"> </span></font></p>
<div>
<div style="text-align: center;" align="center"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">
<hr align="center" size="2" width="100%">
</span></font></div>
<p><b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma; font-weight: bold;">From:</span></font></b><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Tahoma;"> <a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>
[mailto:<a href="mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com</a>]
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">On Behalf Of </span></b>Kim Delevati<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Tuesday, October 06, 2009
9:35 AM<br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> <a href="mailto:asterisk-users@lists.digium.com" target="_blank">asterisk-users@lists.digium.com</a><br>
<b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [asterisk-users] Asterisk
+ Monitor() Poor quality</span></font></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">Hi. I'm
using the Monitor command to record outgoing calls through SIP, but the quality
is very poor, MUCH worse than the call itself who many times is perfect. I can
barely understand anything thats said.<br>
<br>
Im using Asterisk 1.4.21.2 on a Ubuntu Server 8.10, on a Pentium R 2ghz with
1gb DDR2.<br>
<br>
That also happens if I use the Record command. I'm using Monitor inside an AGI
file, could that be the problem? Or do you think its something else?</span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix,
Arizona<br>
Register Now: <a href="http://www.astricon.net" target="_blank">http://www.astricon.net</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a></span></font></p>
</div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix,
Arizona<br>
Register Now: <a href="http://www.astricon.net" target="_blank">http://www.astricon.net</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a></span></font></p>
</div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12pt;"> </span></font></p>
</div></div></div>
</div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by <a href="http://www.api-digital.com" target="_blank">http://www.api-digital.com</a> --<br>
<br>
AstriCon 2009 - October 13 - 15 Phoenix, Arizona<br>
Register Now: <a href="http://www.astricon.net" target="_blank">http://www.astricon.net</a><br>
<br>
asterisk-users mailing list<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:<br>
<a href="http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users" target="_blank">http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users</a><br></blockquote></div><br>