<div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">possibly very simple needs, but that doesn't make it very complete<br>
documentation.<br>
<div class="im"></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Which nobody has stated it is. Just means for your needs (which you have never stated nor pointed to particular missing chunks of documentation for what you intended to do) was far from fulfilling your expectations.</div>
<div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I'm not introducing FUD by stating my opinion about the lack of<br>
documentation, Moises. You're sounding incredibly defensive. Why?<br>
<div class="im"></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I though I made it clear. Your comment sounded to me like FUD, since you give an opinion without pointing to particular instances of your claims, saying "wholly incomplete documentation" sounds extreme (which is typical when trying to introduce FUD). So, is just you sounded like that to me, if you are not trying to do so, then don't get it personal, isn't the point here, for me anyways.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">IRC answers from people hanging around is not documentation. It's what<br>
open-source developers like to think of, sometimes, as a 'complete'<br>
solution, but it doesn't even come close. </blockquote><div>Again, never stated IRC was documentation, and was rather introduced as way of saying, what you cannot find on the wiki, you can find it on IRC, because is for sure there are things that are not on the wiki, even for more used technologies like Asterisk.</div>
<div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
documentation. Which is lacking. This is not FUD. This is not me saying<br>
"Don't touch FreeSWITCH." This is me saying that, if you're looking<br>
for a product with good docs to make an easy transition from traditional<br>
PBX tech to new, or even an easy transition from Asterisk to something<br>
else, you will not find them with FS.</blockquote><div>That is at least a bit better than your first post, re-read your first post again, you never even mentioned transition from Asterisk nor whether you wanted a PBX. Even when Asterisk is sometimes seen as a PBX, can be used as a pstn gw or something else, so, as I said, you never mentioned what you wanted to do nor when did you try (as projects evolve, your statements may no longer be true). In short, the only piece of relevant information I was able to take from your initial post was "documentation is crap and no useful applications exist", for me, that sounds a lot like FUD. But hey, that's just me, I'm sure others will learn something from your post, I just felt the need to give my opinion as you did.</div>
<div><br></div><div> I'm sorry you're offended by my opinions, but in your words, 'I defy</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
you' to show me some comprehensive FreeSWITCH docs. Heck, even SER has<br>
more comprehensive documentation, and that's saying a LOT.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>No offense taken ;-), hope is the same for you. Again, our perspective of what "comprehensive" documentation is differs, needs improvement for sure though. </div>
<div> </div></div>-- <br>Moises Silva<br>Software Developer<br>Sangoma Technologies Inc. | 50 McIntosh Drive, Suite 120, Markham ON L3R 9T3 Canada<br>t. 1 905 474 1990 x 128 | e. <a href="mailto:moy@sangoma.com">moy@sangoma.com</a><br>