<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16850" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009>Hi,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=656570614-21072009>We currently fire
multiple HTTP requests (via multi-curl) to the AJAM interface in order to place
calls. We are finding Asterisk has it's limits however, and I've found
astmanproxy recommended for helping maintain the connections. This would prove
particularly useful with multiple servers of course.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=656570614-21072009>However, in testing
astmanproxy crashes with buffer overflows.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=656570614-21072009>This leads to the
inevitable question: Is astmanproxy still recommended for use or are we missing
some knowledge here?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN class=656570614-21072009>Platform is 64 bit
Intel, Ubuntu 9.04, Asterisk 1.6 with latest trunk of astmanproxy from
github.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009>Thanks,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009>James</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2><SPAN
class=656570614-21072009></SPAN></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>